- PHAN MEM FREE DOYOURDATA SUPER ERASER INSTALL
- PHAN MEM FREE DOYOURDATA SUPER ERASER SOFTWARE
- PHAN MEM FREE DOYOURDATA SUPER ERASER WINDOWS
If a person want's to use unsupported software it's their choice.
PHAN MEM FREE DOYOURDATA SUPER ERASER WINDOWS
Robert Smith, I am still installing mionthly rollups on Vista SP2+ the version number has changed in the same manner as it would have if it had a SP3 installed "Microsoft Windows " but it was done on the quiet not as a formal service pack so microsoft does not have to commit to a few more years of support like they do when a service pack was released for a product. this won't it will attempt to force a dismount of the system drive and all running programs which had files open on the drive at that point will fail either silently or catastrophically depending on how well it was written. Both these programs other tools "Uninstaller" lockup trying to load the loooong list of a few thousand installed programs on this system and has to be end tasked forcibly and the Disk repair tool in this is JUST an interface to use the systems CHKDSK /F /X command so is nothing special and in certain circumstances will do worse than using the tools tab on the drive properties to check q filesystem since that knows to ask about scheduling a chkdsk /f run at next boot up if you try to check the system or other actively used drive. This also a rebrand of AWE Eraser 3.0 that was given away here some time ago, same program component files same erasure methods with no custom pattern options for those of us that just want a nice null'd erased area that compresses really well on a compressed sector by sector image backup.
PHAN MEM FREE DOYOURDATA SUPER ERASER INSTALL
If you do install it manually after unpacking the inno installer package don't forget to run shellsetup.exe assuming your XP is 32bit and not 64bit. You can bypass all that by just using innoextractor or the innounp open source utility and manually install the extracted files or the vendor can fix their broken install_script.iss files in their products and recompile the installers or you could fix the script and recompile it yourself. "MinVersion: 0.0,5.0 Service Pack 4 " Where the 5.0 corresponds to Windows 2000 NOT XP" For it to match the sysrequirements it should be. In the case above it is NT 5.01 Service Pack 4 which is an invalid version of windows.
The MinVersion is the minimum Windows NT Version it will proceed with the installation of that lines file with. Source: "" MinVersion: 0.0,5.01 Service Pack 4 Flags: ignoreversion" JardaH, The reason for this conflicting demand from the installer is that whoever wrote it did not see the same system requirements that we have been shown and included entries like this in the install_script.iss : I have already written several comments that are ALL awaiting moderation clearance before they can be seen publicly as will this one once I've finally posted it.
I have already written several comments that are ALL awaiting moderation clearance before they can be seen publicly as will this one once I've finally posted it.Īnd before you complain that my comment was not useful because it does not talk about the giveaway product. In my opinion useful or potentially useful comments should contain pertinent information about the giveaway product, terms, products operation, it's unique characteristics or lack thereof, any bugs encountered etc or questions on dealing with any problems experienced in participating in giveaway event so others can also read any answers posted to the questions and find answers to problems they too may have experienced but not had the will to ask themselves.Īnd before you complain that my comment was not useful because it does not talk about the giveaway product. It's like those 5 star reviews on shopping platforms that either say nothing relevant about the product purchased or give 5 stars and admit they have not even tried to use the product at all and just delivering a product is worth giving it a 5 star rating. Aronson, unqualified gratitude is unhelpful in a comment.
0 kommentar(er)
